1000' or 1320' for 2009 (1 Viewer)

[Bullard Anderson]

1320' period!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

 

[JL]

I agree Paul, I'd rather see 317mph in 1000' over 305mph in 1320. That just seems wrong to step back 10 years in performance................

I totally agree. I am really enjoying a "safe" 1000' at 315. The racing has been close and the parts attrition has been less.

 

[Toejam]

As much as I'd love to see 1320' again, I'd rather see 312-315 at 1000' ft than 305 at 1320! Plus the oildowns are WAYY down not to mention the parts attrition!

 

[mick]

........I'd rather see 312-315 at 1000' ft than 305 at 1320!........

i stand corrected from my earlier post, i guess some people can make the
distinction between 315 & 305mph.

 

[Toejam]

i stand corrected from my earlier post, i guess some people can make the
distinction between 315 & 305mph.

You would be Correct sir!

 

[Professor Dave]

I'd prefer 1320, but what I'd really prefer is SAFE racing and fewer cars blowing up parts. That where the crew chiefs and NHRA need to get their act together.

But I know that as long as no one but Alan Johnson and the Sarge win races at 1000' that we'll be back to 1320' to give the rest of the teams a chance.