I'm happy that powerade stepped up, happy that they've hung on this
long until the next step will be taken; would have really sucked to have
had coke drop the sponsorship with nothing to replace it.
(i hope that's not the case right now!?)
here is a quote from Glen Grissom's column on dro.
A smaller electronic audience than NASCAR will be a given for some time, but it is a highly “qualified” audience (younger, more involved and with buying power) than the typical NASCAR one, and that is a plus to sell to sponsors. It is also about 10-15 years ahead of NASCAR in the diversity of its audience and participants, and that is a lever that really should be used much more than it has in the past.
What's ever around the corner for nhra pro drag racing had better not
be too hokey. IMO going after the masses (nascar) for a new audience
might be healthy for sponsors short term, but i think dumbing our sport
down would spell the end for a lot of us life long fans.
(nhra pro racing that is) just remember, whether we're staying at the
Holiday Inn or the zip-up tent at the facility; we're the one's religiously
buying the tickets and watching the tv. if things vere too far from the norm,
i have other interests that could easily occupy the very little free
time i have, much less my disposable income.
try to control costs wherever possible, actually racing equipment costs
especially, even if that means.....look out!......slowing the cars down.
if that's not feasable, then find another pocket of money to slice.
I would think it's a two way street - the series and the participants need
more $$ to compensate escalating costs, so in trying to revamp
certain aspects of the sport to attract new fans and sponsors, wouldn't
it be fair to assume that a potential new or even existing sponsor might ask,
'what are you (nhra) and your racers doing to control costs so
I can sign a multi-year agreement with you and/or one of your race teams and expect the same level of performance throughout the agreement
(performance on & off the track)