
08-21-2007, 04:06 PM
|
 |
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 198
Verified Member
|
|
|
Dear NHRA - It's time to 86 Reading for Good
Dear NHRA - The Reading race is nothing but a waste of time and money year after year after year!!! I think it should be taken off the circuit for good and moved elsewhere. I think this would behoove the teams and the fans who NEVER get to see a full weekend of racing. Every single year, the teams are forced to either stay over for multiple days or they're forced to waste one of their valued weekends off going back to that track to finish a rained-out race. And I can only imagine what the financial cost to the NHRA and the teams is. It's ridiculous!!!
|

08-21-2007, 04:16 PM
|
|
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: New York, NY
Posts: 61
Verified Member
|
|
|
Re: Dear NHRA - It's time to 86 Reading for Good
Quote:
Originally Posted by Shan Ochoa
Dear NHRA - The Reading race is nothing but a waste of time and money year after year after year!!! I think it should be taken off the circuit for good and moved elsewhere. I think this would behoove the teams and the fans who NEVER get to see a full weekend of racing. Every single year, the teams are forced to either stay over for multiple days or they're forced to waste one of their valued weekends off going back to that track to finish a rained-out race. And I can only imagine what the financial cost to the NHRA and the teams is. It's ridiculous!!!
|
I vote move it to October when you see the record times and dry, crisp fall air! (see 2001 for example - Darrell Alderman first PS in the 6.7's)
|

08-21-2007, 04:40 PM
|
 |
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: God's Country, Virginia
Posts: 117
Senior Member
|
|
|
Re: Dear NHRA - It's time to 86 Reading for Good
I say leave the stands, make it a lake and have boat races there. If (WHEN) it rains the boats can still race and god knows it will never dry up !
JMSAO
.
.
|

08-21-2007, 04:51 PM
|
 |
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: trumbull, ct
Posts: 1,015
Verified Member
|
|
|
Re: Dear NHRA - It's time to 86 Reading for Good
Quote:
Originally Posted by Billy Anderson
I vote move it to October when you see the record times and dry, crisp fall air! (see 2001 for example - Darrell Alderman first PS in the 6.7's)
|
i vote that too, but its clearly obvious that the nhra wants to slow all the cars down, and with technology and smart crew chiefs, the nhra now slows them down by switching the record setting tracks to non record setting times of the year- like englishtown from early may to mid june ( no more records), only 1 chicago, and the grove to mid august( no records then). just another lame thing nhra has done in a long list.
__________________
kalitta motorsports kb/summit pro stock john force racing-#1 fan visit a legend@ arniebeswick.com
|

08-21-2007, 04:54 PM
|
 |
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Baltimore MD
Posts: 1,797
Verified Member
|
|
|
Re: Dear NHRA - It's time to 86 Reading for Good
Quote:
Originally Posted by Billy Anderson
I vote move it to October when you see the record times and dry, crisp fall air! (see 2001 for example - Darrell Alderman first PS in the 6.7's)
|
I co sign this!!! 
|

08-21-2007, 04:57 PM
|
 |
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Heart of "Dutch Country", PA
Posts: 361
Verified Member
|
|
|
Re: Dear NHRA - It's time to 86 Reading for Good
Quote:
Originally Posted by Billy Anderson
I vote move it to October when you see the record times and dry, crisp fall air! (see 2001 for example - Darrell Alderman first PS in the 6.7's)
|
I'll agree to this long before I agree to take it away. It's not fair to the fans that pack the place to lose the race because of poor scheduling.
__________________
Still missing you Eric! Mint Chocolate Chip was my flavor choice today. It made me smile. In fact, every time I eat ice cream, I instantly think of you...my waistline is cursing you
|

08-21-2007, 05:50 PM
|
|
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: West Haven, CT
Posts: 329
Verified Member
|
|
|
Re: Dear NHRA - It's time to 86 Reading for Good
I think September is the best option but, I've never seen such a PACKED FRIDAY as I did this year. I'd dare say there was a higher percentage (% of sell-out) than at Englishtown.
I can't imagine how more busy it might have been had the weather prediction been better.
Somebody suggested high attendance because the kids were out of school but there didn't appear (to ME) to be a higher percentage of kids than in earlier years.
Too bad Sunday (etc) went downhill.
|

08-21-2007, 05:57 PM
|
 |
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: CT
Posts: 320
Verified Member
|
|
|
Re: Dear NHRA - It's time to 86 Reading for Good
I've been saying all along that they should have moved the race to October. The race in 2004 was as good as any race that I've ever been to. I'm going to guess and say the problem is they don't want Reading and Richmond within a week of each other on the schedule. I remember reading somewhere that a few years ago George Case wanted the race in October but they moved it to August instead. How many other tracks besides Vegas and Pomona can get the gates that Maple Grove got AFTER Labor Day? IMO Maple Grove has been on the schedule for 20+ years and should not have to yield their desired date to Richmond, a track that returned to NHRA after being an IHRA track for 5 years.
|

08-21-2007, 08:15 PM
|
 |
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Winnipeg, Manitoba
Posts: 170
Verified Member
|
|
|
Re: Dear NHRA - It's time to 86 Reading for Good
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jeff Dibaigio
i vote that too, but its clearly obvious that the nhra wants to slow all the cars down, and with technology and smart crew chiefs, the nhra now slows them down by switching the record setting tracks to non record setting times of the year- like englishtown from early may to mid june ( no more records), only 1 chicago, and the grove to mid august( no records then). just another lame thing nhra has done in a long list.
|
Just wait until NHRA moves the Phoenix race to August! 
|

08-21-2007, 08:28 PM
|
|
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Tabernacle, NJ
Posts: 35
Verified Member
|
|
|
Re: Dear NHRA - It's time to 86 Reading for Good
Quote:
Originally Posted by Brian Papallo
I've been saying all along that they should have moved the race to October. The race in 2004 was as good as any race that I've ever been to. I'm going to guess and say the problem is they don't want Reading and Richmond within a week of each other on the schedule. I remember reading somewhere that a few years ago George Case wanted the race in October but they moved it to August instead. How many other tracks besides Vegas and Pomona can get the gates that Maple Grove got AFTER Labor Day? IMO Maple Grove has been on the schedule for 20+ years and should not have to yield their desired date to Richmond, a track that returned to NHRA after being an IHRA track for 5 years.
|
Abso f***in' lutely !!! Brian, very well said. This race should have been moved to October.
That's where George Case wanted it and he got the short end of the stick.
|
| Thread Tools |
Search this Thread |
|
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|
|
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:07 AM.