www.nitromater.com

John Force vs the Slip-tube chassis

This is a discussion on John Force vs the Slip-tube chassis within the NHRA forum, part of the Pit Area category; On one of the last couple of shows or maybe NHRA2Day, it was said that John is the only driver ...


Go Back   www.nitromater.com > Pit Area > NHRA

Invite Your FriendsChat RoomBlogsHelpCenter Register Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read
Notices



Reply

 

Thread Tools Search this Thread
  #1  
Old 07-31-2006, 04:52 PM
Nitro Freak
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Louisville, KY
Posts: 105
John Force vs the Slip-tube chassis

On one of the last couple of shows or maybe NHRA2Day, it was said that John is the only driver running at present with a rigid style chassis. That's the first I had heard that. Both Robert & Eric run the slip-tube along with everyone else in the class. With the apparent consistancy/inconsistancy problems he's had of late it kinda made me go "Hmmm, wonder why he won't switch".
Anybody else have any thoughts or info on that deal? Just curious & I like gettin' into the chassis/techno stuff............"HIP"
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 07-31-2006, 05:09 PM
David N Gawboy's Avatar
Nitro Freak
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Rosemount, Minnesowtah
Posts: 1,436
When Cruz burned his primary car up, they went to the backup car. They mentioned that was the car Cruz won Vegas in, and it was a rigid tube, not a slip tube like the car that burned up.
__________________
AKA DrRocket
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 07-31-2006, 05:19 PM
Dalton Blevins's Avatar
DLB
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Ringgold, GA
Posts: 465
Quote:
Originally Posted by Roger Hood View Post
On one of the last couple of shows or maybe NHRA2Day, it was said that John is the only driver running at present with a rigid style chassis. That's the first I had heard that. Both Robert & Eric run the slip-tube along with everyone else in the class. With the apparent consistancy/inconsistancy problems he's had of late it kinda made me go "Hmmm, wonder why he won't switch".
Anybody else have any thoughts or info on that deal? Just curious & I like gettin' into the chassis/techno stuff............"HIP"
That is interesting. I hadn't caught that. I usually just breeze through the NHRA2Day shows though since they are on my DVR when I get home from church. I watched the last 2 weeks episodes today at lunch actually in about 30 minutes...

If he is, I am sure he has a reason, but I'd like to know what it is.
He does seem to have some inconsistency.
__________________
Proverbs 17:27 Whoever restrains his words has knowledge, and he who has a cool spirit is a man of understanding. 28 Even a fool who keeps silent is considered wise; when he closes his lips, he is deemed intelligent.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 07-31-2006, 07:09 PM
Tony Smith's Avatar
Nitro Freak
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Aurora, Illinois
Posts: 609
Quote:
Originally Posted by Roger Hood View Post
On one of the last couple of shows or maybe NHRA2Day, it was said that John is the only driver running at present with a rigid style chassis. That's the first I had heard that. Both Robert & Eric run the slip-tube along with everyone else in the class. With the apparent consistancy/inconsistancy problems he's had of late it kinda made me go "Hmmm, wonder why he won't switch".
Anybody else have any thoughts or info on that deal? Just curious & I like gettin' into the chassis/techno stuff............"HIP"
I know Wilkerson didn't start running a slip tube chassis until Dallas 2005. Sounds like they got a new car at the shop right now, but I'm not sure what type of McKinney chassis it is.

Last I heard, Medlin & Hight cars were McKinney cars and Force was still racing a Steve Plueger chassis. Someone he has been very loyal to.
__________________
www.zizzoracing.com
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 07-31-2006, 07:33 PM
Buzzz Miller's Avatar
Nitro Freak
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Peoria, AZ.
Posts: 350
I had not heard that Force went back to Pleugar stuff. I know a few years ago he switched everything over to McKinney due to lack of Steve building any more cars. I know his tune-up struggled for a while to get stuff switched over. I know he sold lots of his Pleugar stuff off. Did he buy it back?
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 07-31-2006, 09:06 PM
Jeff Dibaigio's Avatar
Nitro Freak
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: trumbull, ct
Posts: 1,066
interesting point hip. i didnt catch it on nhra today. wonder why myself. force seems like a guy who hates change.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 07-31-2006, 09:11 PM
Erica Ortiz's Avatar
Horsepower & Heels
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Grant, AL
Posts: 297
Question...

I've heard of the slip vs. rigid chassis, but am having a hard time picturing how a slip tube chassis works. Anyone have a picture that can point it out for me? thanks, I'm pretty new to the upper echelons...
__________________
My website: www.horsepowerandheels.com
READ MY BLOG Watch Horsepower & Heels TV
Currently FFW Pro 5.0/ ADRL Pro Mod, but still Chasing my NHRA dreams!
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 07-31-2006, 10:02 PM
Nitro Freak
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Louisville, KY
Posts: 105
I think Plueger got completely out of the business. He played around with his own car for a while, letting arguably the best F/C driver in the country, Dale Pulde, play along with him.
Seems I read somewhere that he was now foolin' around with some nostalgia stuff, but I occasionally have what has been diagnosed as brain farts. They ain't no fun I'm tellin' ya. ..........."HIP"
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 07-31-2006, 10:28 PM
Nitro Freak
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 29
When we started the 05 season, we had a brand new Murf slip tube car as well. It was super easy to drive, but every now and then it seemed to take a set and wouldn't drive straight for nothing. Then you would reset the front end and re scale the car ( get the right rear weight right) and it was great again. Like anything that is new there are always some updates. The earlier cars had a tendancy to move all over the place if you pedaled them and the "lifespan" of the front half of the chassis was only about 60-75 runs before it started to sag. Then you would just front half the chassis again. Without giving away any trade secrets the newer style chassis is better...we just updated ours recently and it drives a lot better now. BTW Force still has the Murf "rigid" chassis.
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 07-31-2006, 10:33 PM
Tony Smith's Avatar
Nitro Freak
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Aurora, Illinois
Posts: 609
Hey Jeff, when did Force quit running Pluegar cars...can't be more than a couple years?

And thanks for the info.
__________________
www.zizzoracing.com
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 07-31-2006, 10:35 PM
Nitro Freak
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Louisville, KY
Posts: 105
Erica, at Indy last year I asked a crew guy about that & he said come over here & he led me to the front of the car & showed it to me. Very nice fellow but I can't remember what team he was with. (Check the above post). Roughly about a foot & 1/2 back from the front axle the upper frame rail is designed so that one section of the tubing slips inside the accompaning section allowing that rail to expand & contract back & forth so to speak. There are stops welded on each section allowing it to "stretch", or lengthen, but only about an 1/8 inch according to him. Doesn't sound like much but he said it was enough to let the chassis "bow" kinda like a mini version of the T/F chassis. It also allows for a more gentle rise to the front end, smoothing down the reaction of the launch, if you can imagine the words gentle & F/C launch being used in the same sentence.
There is a drawback though in that it allows the car to dart around more from side to side during the run, which can be especially troublesome if the car drops a cylinder. Hope this helps a little......."HIP"
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 07-31-2006, 10:43 PM
Nitro Freak
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Louisville, KY
Posts: 105
Sorry Jeff, I was writing my response the same time you were writing yours. While I've got your ear in a manner of speaking, when are we going to see you out there again. The sooner the better for me & I'm sure you probably feel the same way................"HIP"
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 07-31-2006, 10:57 PM
Terry Mayhew's Avatar
Nitro Freak
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: aloha oregon
Posts: 135
erica picture a pipe 1 1/2" diam and inside that pipe another pipe 1 1/4"diam and in that pipe another pipe 1"diam and non of these pipes are welded to each other? the bottom rails are solid all the way up the top rails are the slip tube rails. so when ya hit the throttle the chasis raises up and the top tube pulls apart from each other just a little bit! i hope that kinda helps with a picture of what a slip tube is! even my sons jr. dragster uses this technology and it's pretty cool
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 08-01-2006, 06:46 AM
Erica Ortiz's Avatar
Horsepower & Heels
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Grant, AL
Posts: 297
Thanks, guys! I'll see if I can get a closer look at one in Indy now that I know what to look for.
__________________
My website: www.horsepowerandheels.com
READ MY BLOG Watch Horsepower & Heels TV
Currently FFW Pro 5.0/ ADRL Pro Mod, but still Chasing my NHRA dreams!
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 08-01-2006, 08:15 AM
Ron Dunlap's Avatar
Nitro Freak
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Bristol, TN
Posts: 1,968
Recipes: 1
I'd say the vast majority of dragsters sold today that don't have rear suspension have slip joints in the top rails in front of the driver's compartment. They're very common in faster dragster classes.
__________________
I'm an optimist. My glass is 1/4 full, not 3/4 empty!
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



New To Site?

Need Help?




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:53 PM.


Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Nitromater Ltd.

Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.1.0 ©2007, Crawlability, Inc.

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58