 |
|

04-19-2007, 06:20 PM
|
|
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Parker, CO
Posts: 30
|
|
|
Amen to this article - No Provisionals in our sport!
Article - Sports - NASCAR could learn from NHRA
I know a lot of people wanted Force to qualify, but this is another reason why i like our sport...I'll add no yellow flag finishes (or did they get rid of those?) or no second chances...used to be a great radio commercial out in the 80's that Dave Mac did that had similar thoughts.
|

04-19-2007, 06:27 PM
|
 |
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Gulfport, MS
Posts: 312
|
|
|
Re: Amen to this article - No Provisionals in our sport!
NASCAR"S "Top 35 in Points" rule sucks. Many faster cars are left out because they aren't in the top 35 in season points. Stupid, isn't it? The fastest cars should get to race on race day.
|

04-19-2007, 06:40 PM
|
 |
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Hanover, MA
Posts: 5
|
|
|
Re: Amen to this article - No Provisionals in our sport!
NASCAR seems to be headed for WWE wrestling format.
__________________
1697 J/SA
Stockers are WAY cool!
|

04-19-2007, 06:52 PM
|
|
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Albuquerque, NM
Posts: 3,887
|
|
|
Re: Amen to this article - No Provisionals in our sport!
"IF" NHRA ever decided on Provisionals, it would make qualifying irrelivent!
__________________
Shift for Brains!!!!
|

04-19-2007, 06:56 PM
|
|
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Charlotte NC
Posts: 133
|
|
|
Re: Amen to this article - No Provisionals in our sport!
David Poole, in the Charlotte Observer says that Nascar "owes it to the fans to have the "stars" in the field." "They pay their money expecting to see certain drivers on Sunday." BALONEY
Link to article That's Racin' | 04/19/2007 | NASCAR's formula wouldn't have let John Force fall short
Last edited by David Tolley; 04-19-2007 at 06:58 PM.
|

04-19-2007, 08:57 PM
|
 |
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Florida
Posts: 650
|
|
|
Re: Amen to this article - No Provisionals in our sport!
I think the guy makes a point. Everyone who enters gets four runs in front of a packed house in our sport. Not so over there.
who cares what they do anyway.
|

04-19-2007, 09:39 PM
|
 |
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: 3,237 ft above Bandimere
Posts: 56
|
|
|
Re: Amen to this article - No Provisionals in our sport!
lol...Dale Jarrett just used his 5th champions provisional to get in to the phoenix nascar race  ...what's it been?- 8 races?
|

04-19-2007, 10:08 PM
|
 |
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Kelso, Washington
Posts: 141
|
|
|
Re: Amen to this article - No Provisionals in our sport!
This is just another reason why I will probably never watch another NASCAR race again. It just is not very compelling to me anymore. I used to follow it in the eighties and nineties, but I haven't really followed much for the past seven years. Lame 
|

04-19-2007, 10:12 PM
|
|
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Austin TX
Posts: 204
|
|
|
Re: Amen to this article - No Provisionals in our sport!
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bob Cole
who cares what they do anyway.
|
I agree, but NHRA seems to care a lot. (unfortunately)
|

04-19-2007, 10:31 PM
|
 |
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Tempe, AZ
Posts: 1,047
|
|
|
Re: Amen to this article - No Provisionals in our sport!
Quote:
Originally Posted by Erik Bilisoly
lol...Dale Jarrett just used his 5th champions provisional to get in to the phoenix nascar race  ...what's it been?- 8 races?
|
And . . . thankfully, he only has one left! After that, he will probably be watching the rest of the races with his team owner.
NASCAR continues to spew BS about "Diversity", while female and minority drivers make great progress in our sport. If NASCAR was sincere about diversity, the fastest 43 drivers at any race would be racing!
__________________
"The Counterfeiter"
|

04-20-2007, 06:39 AM
|
 |
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 465
|
|
|
Re: Amen to this article - No Provisionals in our sport!
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jim Young
If NASCAR was sincere about diversity, the fastest 43 drivers at any race would be racing!
|
I like all forms of racing, but I hate the provisionals. As for "sincere" NASCAR is the same as NHRA, only sincere about lining their own pockets!
|

04-20-2007, 07:01 AM
|
 |
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Grand Blanc,Michigan
Posts: 24
|
|
|
Re: Amen to this article - No Provisionals in our sport!
Nascar really does suck. Just my 2cents.
|

04-20-2007, 07:56 AM
|
|
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 120
|
|
Re: Amen to this article - No Provisionals in our sport!
Great post, I agree the roundie round guys now are a bunch of whiners
anyway, if you read some of the articles they complain to much, this is a perfect time for NHRA to capitalize on some advertisements, they shold do some commercials to stir it up a little, for instance, NHRA real men qualify
their cars  roundie rounders use stats to get in the big show, have some fuel cars going 330 mph and some cups cars rollin to the pits, fans & sponsors love good ole gesting and controversy  this day and time people like going against the grain  i guess that's my downfall
i like dealing the suits some crap it keeps things alive. I'm an ole Earnhardt
fan he didn't care, he wanting to win races and the money and sponsors
came anyway so don't gimmie that political correctness junk. my 2 cents
Bama Boys
|

04-20-2007, 11:13 AM
|
 |
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: CT
Posts: 323
|
|
|
Re: Amen to this article - No Provisionals in our sport!
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ted Linroth
I agree, but NHRA seems to care a lot. (unfortunately)
|
Mmm Hmmm. Unfortunately, I feel the same way. I don't see John Force consistently not qualifying anytime soon, but I think if he did, you'd start to see some sort of qualifying "in". He's the guy that puts the most fannies in the seats in our sport, or at least is the one guy that virtually everyone knows something about. I always seem to notice that on Fridays and Saturdays, you get a lot of people at the track that just want to see these crazy fast, fiercely loud cars, just because they're so amazing. They usually don't know who's who, but when John Force comes out and does that long burnout, the place just buzzes. This certainly isn't a bash on Force, but if NHRA were to start losing out on that, that's where you'd see a change.
Personally, the "go fast or go home" deal is one of the reasons to love our sport. The competitors know it, and that's why the don't roll through the gate to start a weekend thinking "well, we're already in the show". It keeps these guys from getting complacent, and that's half of the show. Unless you're into the Sportsman categories, there'll be absolutely no reason to care about Friday or Saturday if they ever decided to bring in some sort of "provisional" rule.
__________________
StockersRock
|

04-20-2007, 11:35 AM
|
 |
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Riverview, Florida
Posts: 241
|
|
|
Re: Amen to this article - No Provisionals in our sport!
At one tme, NHRA used the "provisional" deal with defending pro champions at national events. This was back in the early-mid 70's. It usually was not necessary because if the defending champ were at an event, he/she would more than likely qualify anyway. If my memory is working (it's on and off), I think Chip Woodall got into the Springnationals field back in '73 (?) based on his defending champion status. Anbody remember him? He drove Gene Snow's Top Fuel car to a win in Columbus. In any event, NHRA did away with the silly provisional qualifying deal.
|
 |
|
| Thread Tools |
Search this Thread |
|
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|
|