
12-29-2006, 05:45 PM
|
 |
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Gateshead, England
Posts: 507
Verified Member
|
|
Will the NHRA ever allow 90% nitro use again
After the tragic death of Darrell Russell the NHRA reduced the nitro percentage down to 85%, although 90% nitro is allowed to be used at Denver.
Do you think the NHRA will ever allow 90% nitro to be used again?
90% nitro is the maximum allowed in England.
__________________
Fuel Altereds Forever
|

12-29-2006, 05:49 PM
|
 |
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: SoCal
Posts: 222
Verified Member
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by John Hutchinson
Do you think the NHRA will ever allow 90% nitro to be used again?
|
This Conversation with Dan Olson might answer the question better than a guessing game.
Is the new season here yet?
.
|

12-29-2006, 06:03 PM
|
|
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Wanganui , New Zealand
Posts: 319
Verified Member
|
|
|
I say bring back 100% , I have read alot of articles and interviews and the crew chiefs seem to agree that 100% with an blower overdrive restriction of about 30% would solve the damage problem . One article I read was about austin coil and he said that the cars just don't sound right and that they need the sound of 100% and the fire in the pipes and that it would do bad things for the classes if they lost that .If anyone knows what those cars need its coil , not only is he the master of performance but he is also the master of putting on a show from his match racing days . I read quite a bit about that darrel russel crash and I heard that alot of people tried getting blaimed for that . People and companies shouldnt be blamed for accidents because it was just that an accident , sometimes accidents happen and you can't do anything about it .
|

12-29-2006, 06:43 PM
|
 |
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: San Diego, CA
Posts: 622
Verified Member
|
|
|
I don't know whether or not they will, but I'll tell ya this... I've been catching up on some history by watching Diamond P's season reviews from 1986 through 1997 and even on TV the cackle sounds better with the higher percentages! I, for one, hope they bring back at least 90%, if not more.
__________________
Gordon 'Flaps' Carlon
Work the solution, not the problem.
|

12-29-2006, 08:02 PM
|
|
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Albuquerque, NM
Posts: 3,648
Verified Member
|
|
|
If NHRA listens to Dan Olson, the answers yes! But the Crewchiefs have been complaining about the Parts attrition of 85% for over a year and Graham Light doesn't seem to want to listen.
__________________
Shift for Brains!!!!
|

12-29-2006, 10:13 PM
|
 |
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Milwaukie, OR
Posts: 1,620
Verified Member
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Gordon Carlon
I've been catching up on some history by watching Diamond P's season reviews from 1986 through 1997 and even on TV the cackle sounds better with the higher percentages!
|
I know I've said it here a few times but the A/fuel cars sound meaner at idle than the big boys. When they're warming up an A/fuel car and they let out the clutch and grab the brake it sounds so frickin' cool it gives me goosebumps just thinking about it!  It makes the big boys cars sound like they're neutered by comparison.
|

12-29-2006, 11:52 PM
|
 |
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Parker, Colorado
Posts: 887
Verified Member
|
|
|
I just can't see the sanctioning body "giving back" anything they've already taken away. If you want to see 90% in a PowerAde motor...... your best bet is to check with you favorite airline for price & availability in July for a long weekend here in beautiful Denver, Colorado.
__________________
Who will? HILLARY WILL !
|

12-30-2006, 01:18 AM
|
 |
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Spirit Lake, ID
Posts: 68
Verified Member
|
|
|
Maybe allow 100% nitro but put a 30% (or whatever) restriction on the blower overdrive. This way you won't spin the blower too fast (has to make the blower last longer, less heat, etc).
But if the crew chiefs are complaining about parts breakage (along with the team's accounts payable person), maybe NHRA should start listening.
__________________
NITRO! Some is good, more is better and too much is just enough.
John
|

12-30-2006, 07:18 AM
|
 |
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: PA.
Posts: 590
Verified Member
|
|
|
Maybe IHRA should go to 100% leave the points the same way,and get some of the big hitters over there,that there would open Cant fix stupid's eyes.
|

12-30-2006, 08:23 AM
|
|
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: NC
Posts: 261
Verified Member
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Brent Busch
I know I've said it here a few times but the A/fuel cars sound meaner at idle than the big boys. When they're warming up an A/fuel car and they let out the clutch and grab the brake it sounds so frickin' cool it gives me goosebumps just thinking about it!  It makes the big boys cars sound like they're neutered by comparison.
|
I agree they sound wicked
|

12-30-2006, 11:21 AM
|
 |
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Minnesota
Posts: 1,050
Verified Member
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Brent Busch
I know I've said it here a few times but the A/fuel cars sound meaner at idle than the big boys. When they're warming up an A/fuel car and they let out the clutch and grab the brake it sounds so frickin' cool it gives me goosebumps just thinking about it!  It makes the big boys cars sound like they're neutered by comparison.
|
another in agreement.
|

12-30-2006, 07:04 PM
|
|
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Albuquerque, NM
Posts: 3,648
Verified Member
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Brent Busch
I know I've said it here a few times but the A/fuel cars sound meaner at idle than the big boys. When they're warming up an A/fuel car and they let out the clutch and grab the brake it sounds so frickin' cool it gives me goosebumps just thinking about it!  It makes the big boys cars sound like they're neutered by comparison.
|
I agree at Idle there's a Huge difference, but on the track there's NO Comparison! Listen behind the stands when a pair of A-Fuelers run vs a Pair of TF/FC and it's Night and day!
__________________
Shift for Brains!!!!
|

12-30-2006, 07:54 PM
|
 |
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Aurora, Illinois
Posts: 588
Verified Member
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jer Weaver
Maybe IHRA should go to 100% leave the points the same way, and get some of the big hitters over there,that there would open Cant fix stupid's eyes.
|
If any NHRA hitters went IHRA racing, it wouldn't be for any of the reasons you just stated.
|

12-30-2006, 11:30 PM
|
 |
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Hurricaneville, formally NY.
Posts: 1,399
Verified Member
|
|
I agree, put the cars back to at least 90%.
Quote:
Originally Posted by William Payne
I say bring back 100% , I have read alot of articles and interviews and the crew chiefs seem to agree that 100% with an blower overdrive restriction of about 30% would solve the damage problem . One article I read was about austin coil and he said that the cars just don't sound right and that they need the sound of 100% and the fire in the pipes and that it would do bad things for the classes if they lost that .If anyone knows what those cars need its coil , not only is he the master of performance but he is also the master of putting on a show from his match racing days . I read quite a bit about that darrel russel crash and I heard that alot of people tried getting blaimed for that . People and companies shouldnt be blamed for accidents because it was just that an accident , sometimes accidents happen and you can't do anything about it .
|
Not to go off-topic, but the crash you mentioned was a freak thing and should have been an incentive to allow the monowing back in competition, not a reduction in nitro. If not for that wayward wing strut Darrell would still be with us today. 
__________________
Q: What do you call cheese that doesn't belong to you?
A: Nacho cheese!
|
| Thread Tools |
Search this Thread |
|
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|
|