www.nitromater.com

is the high elevation really that bad at Bandimere?

This is a discussion on is the high elevation really that bad at Bandimere? within the NHRA forum, part of the Pit Area category; Every Mile High Nationals, the TV announcers make such a fuss over the 5800' elevation at Bandimere. Does the 100% ...


Go Back   www.nitromater.com > Pit Area > NHRA

Invite Your FriendsChat RoomBlogsHelpCenter Register Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read
Notices



Reply

 

Thread Tools Search this Thread Translate
  #1  
Old 05-12-2008, 02:07 PM
jim
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Arvada, Colorado
Posts: 126
is the high elevation really that bad at Bandimere?

Every Mile High Nationals, the TV announcers make such a fuss over the 5800' elevation at Bandimere.

Does the 100% Nitro help in the Nitro classes at least?
Doesn't the thin air reduce air drag and help make up for the reduced HP?
In the end, don't they end up running some pretty respectable times/speeds anyway?
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 05-12-2008, 02:21 PM
Paul Rogers Jr's Avatar
Bullet
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Rockwall, TX - via Australia
Posts: 1,047
Re: is the high elevation really that bad at Bandimere?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Jim Sellon View Post
Every Mile High Nationals, the TV announcers make such a fuss over the 5800' elevation at Bandimere.

Does the 100% Nitro help in the Nitro classes at least?
Doesn't the thin air reduce air drag and help make up for the reduced HP?
In the end, don't they end up running some pretty respectable times/speeds anyway?
The Pro Stock cars take the biggest hit as they can't compensate for the lack of oxygen by upping the boost as the supercharged cars can.

With the Fuel cars the thinner air actually results in less drag and downforce which results in less load on the motor and less traction which contributes to the slower ET's.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 05-12-2008, 02:31 PM
Jay Smith's Avatar
Nitro Freak
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: No Cal
Posts: 1,093
Re: is the high elevation really that bad at Bandimere?

It also seems like they mentioned more trouble getting the chutes to deploy up there. I would think at those speeds it wouldn't matter but I think they commented on that in years gone by.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 05-12-2008, 02:35 PM
Greg Stanley's Avatar
Nitro Freak
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Brentwood, CA
Posts: 647
Re: is the high elevation really that bad at Bandimere?

You guys typing more than a one word answer are wasting time. The answer to the question is...

YES!!

__________________
Greg Stanley
2007 NorCal Top Comp Champion
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 05-12-2008, 02:38 PM
Nitro Freak
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 133
Re: is the high elevation really that bad at Bandimere?

From what I have been told, YES!!!!
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 05-12-2008, 02:50 PM
jim
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Arvada, Colorado
Posts: 126
Re: is the high elevation really that bad at Bandimere?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Jay Smith View Post
It also seems like they mentioned more trouble getting the chutes to deploy up there. I would think at those speeds it wouldn't matter but I think they commented on that in years gone by.
Last year during the Nats, I was surprised when Mike (not Paul) said a racer's chute(s) didn't deploy, possibly because of thin air. I guess that can happen, but that time the chute containers never even opened. I guess he and Paul don't have a monitor on every camera in use, because sometimes it seems they don't see the final TV picture.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 05-12-2008, 03:06 PM
Terry Larsen's Avatar
Nitro Freak
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: On a small farm in south central nebraska
Posts: 1,672
Re: is the high elevation really that bad at Bandimere?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Greg Stanley View Post
You guys typing more than a one word answer are wasting time. The answer to the question is...

YES!!

I second that, Greg. I love to run at Bandimere, but there definitely is a drop off in performance. My home track here in Nebraska is at 2310 feet, and when we go to Bandimere, our rule of thumb is that you will fall off about 6 tenths if you made the right changes. If you fall off more than that, you goofed--if you pick up (don't laugh, I have seen it happen!) you obviously had a fubar setup back home.
Super gas index goes from the sea level 9.90 to the 10.53 at Denver.
Yes, for the normally aspirated group, there is quite a dropoff in et. My first launch at Bandimere, I always nearly lift cause it feels like something has gone south powerwise in the car--but you adapt to it very quickly, and the neat part about it is the next race you go after Bandimere, it really seems like your car hauls a$$!
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 05-12-2008, 03:16 PM
Nitro Freak
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 204
Re: is the high elevation really that bad at Bandimere?

I loved W.J.s comment one year at Bandimere.
"When you see the birds walking you know it's bad"
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 05-12-2008, 03:52 PM
Buzzz Miller's Avatar
Nitro Freak
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Peoria, AZ.
Posts: 365
Re: is the high elevation really that bad at Bandimere?

It does not help that the Mile Highs are at a very hot time weather wise. The 90+ degree heat makes the air in the 10,000 range adjusted.
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 05-12-2008, 03:53 PM
Denny Johnson's Avatar
Nitro Freak
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Denver
Posts: 51
Re: is the high elevation really that bad at Bandimere?

We have been racing in Denver for 30+ years. The air is bad, nothing at all like sea level. We generally go 4 steps richer in main jetting when going to sea level. In 2006 at the Mile Highs we showed a Density Altitude of 10,098 ft. on Sunday @ 3:09 pm. My son's T/D car runs 7.20 @ 186 @ 7500 ft D/A at sea level that would convert to 6.83 @ 196.
Warren is correct the birds just walk around on the ground here.
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 05-12-2008, 04:00 PM
Chris Wilt's Avatar
Nitro Freak
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Parker, Colorado
Posts: 1,004
Re: is the high elevation really that bad at Bandimere?

It is very noticeable. Even with a good, higher-end everyday street car you can tell a marked difference in performance. Once I drove my fromer car, Saab 9-3 down to Fort Worth, and I was really surprised how much better it ran down there with absolutely no mods.

As for the race cars, last year at Bandimere on Saturday afternoon between sessions, Hillary Will's Dad told me that JimO & Troy were crunching the numbers - based on a corrected altitude of close to 13,000 feet with the heat factored in.
__________________
On my arm until the day I die, but in my heart forever
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 05-12-2008, 04:40 PM
Nitro Freak
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Albuquerque, NM
Posts: 4,334
Re: is the high elevation really that bad at Bandimere?

When it's over 85 degrees at Bandimere, the corrected's around 10,000 ft!
__________________
Shift for Brains!!!!
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 05-12-2008, 04:58 PM
Samuel Davidowicz's Avatar
HEMI6point1
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Hurricaneville, formally NY.
Posts: 1,615
Re: is the high elevation really that bad at Bandimere?

Well at least the all-concrete surface and cooling pipes should help this year...
__________________
7/20/08 - T-bone's first win.
HEMI's and LS-series motors rock!
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 05-12-2008, 05:13 PM
Nitro Freak
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Albuquerque, NM
Posts: 4,334
Re: is the high elevation really that bad at Bandimere?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Samuel Davidowicz View Post
Well at least the all-concrete surface and cooling pipes should help this year...
The Cooling pipes would be a big help if they went past 60'.
__________________
Shift for Brains!!!!
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 05-12-2008, 05:17 PM
Jenn Jaramillo's Avatar
Nitro Freak
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Land of Enchantment
Posts: 2,248
Recipes: 7
Re: is the high elevation really that bad at Bandimere?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Samuel Davidowicz View Post
Well at least the all-concrete surface and cooling pipes should help this year...
I could be wrong but I don't think the all-concrete surface, nor the cooling pipes help inject oxygen into the atmosphere.

The lack of oxygen/ plus density altitude was/ and is the only real difference in the track itself. You can take the same concrete as a super track and move it over to the mountain and you'll still be stuck with little oxygen for the normally aspirated cars.

Last edited by Jenn Jaramillo; 05-12-2008 at 05:35 PM.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



New To Site?

Need Help?




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:17 PM.


Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Nitromater Ltd.

Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.1.0 ©2007, Crawlability, Inc.

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61