 |
|

11-26-2007, 07:07 PM
|
|
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 36
|
|
|
HDpartners
is anyone else waiting for the hdpartners to save drag racing.
|

11-26-2007, 07:25 PM
|
 |
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Sanger, TX
Posts: 210
|
|
|
Re: HDpartners
Scared s-less, actually. Larry Dixon mentioned very early on that it couldn't be any worse (to paraphrase) than the current regime. I wonder.
I'm actually waiting for the Force/Bader/Smith hostile takeover.
|

11-26-2007, 08:01 PM
|
 |
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Stockton, CA
Posts: 154
|
|
|
Re: HDpartners
I'm STILL waiting for Santa Claus to bring me Salma Hayek in a Triple Black Corvette Convertible, but I think I have a much better chance of seeing THAT at this point in time than a "savior" in "HDPartners". Comeon guys, the press on this has been almost non existant and here we are in the off season and not a peep from this so called "company"?? I call bullsh--.
|

11-26-2007, 08:19 PM
|
 |
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Tempe, AZ
Posts: 1,047
|
|
|
Re: HDpartners
Sponsors departing like rats leaving a sinking ship, absoute silence on new chassis rules and not a word on how HD Partners are going to save our sport.
Testing starts in eight weeks . . . if a lot of things don't happen very quickly, the 2008 season could get off to an ugly start.
__________________
"The Counterfeiter"
|

11-27-2007, 07:06 AM
|
 |
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Ann Arbor, Michigan
Posts: 3,064
|
|
|
Re: HDpartners
I WANT to be hopeful.....just haven't been given any reason to be yet.
Still hoping though
|

11-27-2007, 10:18 AM
|
 |
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: No Cal
Posts: 1,087
|
|
|
Re: HDpartners
I don't really expect much news until they are closer to the deal actually going through.
|

11-27-2007, 10:53 AM
|
|
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: H-Town
Posts: 78
|
|
|
Re: HDpartners
Yeah right, Compton, Light and all of the same old management, managing the same old way as before, I don't think so. 
|

11-27-2007, 11:20 AM
|
|
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Phoenix, AZ
Posts: 234
|
|
|
Re: HDpartners
Call me naive, but I am very positive about the acquisition. HD Partners is a public company, with a responsibility to shareholders to generate a profit and and to grow the business year-to-year. This is a big change from NHRA's non-profit model which has been in place in the past.
I look forward to the acquisition being finalized to see what HD Partners has planned for the future of professional NHRA drag racing. I suspect that they have been in the planning stages for most of this year and that we are about to see what they have in store?
|

11-27-2007, 11:39 AM
|
 |
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 371
|
|
|
Re: HDpartners
Quote:
Originally Posted by Terry Grice
is anyone else waiting for the hdpartners to save drag racing.
|
Ever think that maybe now that the Russell deal has been settled, there might not be an accusation?
Jay
|

11-27-2007, 11:43 AM
|
 |
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Peoria, Arizona
Posts: 2,148
|
|
|
Re: HDpartners
On one hand I'm with J.C. on this. I have every reason to believe someone/group with that much interest and funding knows something that we don't about what they could do to move such an organization forward in a major way. Why in the heck would they be interested in purchasing it if not?
Now, on the other hand, like Gary Miller says it's "Meet the new Boss--Same as the old Boss." That's what confuses me the most. I suspect it was a requirement of the agreement of sale and that without such there would be no sale without the preservation of the kings.
|

11-27-2007, 11:45 AM
|
|
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: West Haven, CT
Posts: 374
|
|
|
Re: HDpartners
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jay Eshbach
Ever think that maybe now that the Russell deal has been settled, there might not be an accusation?
Jay
|
This Darrell Russell stuff floats arounds every so often.
Doesn't ANYBODY think NHRA didn't have insurance for this matter? There were also unspecified "contingencies" in the document that probaly more than covered any outstanding claims within their self-insured retention (dedictible).
I don't think the Russell suit had ANYTHING to do with the transaction.
|

11-27-2007, 07:31 PM
|
|
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 80
|
|
|
Re: HDpartners
One thing that concluding the Russell affair did was probably clean the slate and not leave that business unfinished before the HD takeover(?).
Below is a subject bandied about for years:
Is NHRA self-insured?
Any LEARNED voices out there with FACTS?
|

11-27-2007, 07:58 PM
|
|
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 11
|
|
|
Re: HDpartners
Now that HD Partners, behind the scenes backer, has his new dragstrip and another 80 million in incentives, things will happen. The backer knows how to make money in auto racing. Look for SMI to take over HD.
Art
|

11-27-2007, 08:11 PM
|
 |
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Peoria, Arizona
Posts: 2,148
|
|
|
Re: HDpartners
Quote:
Originally Posted by Arthur Dromgoole
Now that HD Partners, behind the scenes backer, has his new dragstrip and another 80 million in incentives, things will happen. The backer knows how to make money in auto racing. Look for SMI to take over HD.
Art
|
You know, Art, if you are right, and I hope you are, I wonder how long Mr. Compton will remain at the helm? I'm thinking he will be re-assigned to the anchor position?
|

11-27-2007, 08:20 PM
|
|
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: West Haven, CT
Posts: 374
|
|
|
Re: HDpartners
Quote:
Originally Posted by Norm Porter
One thing that concluding the Russell affair did was probably clean the slate and not leave that business unfinished before the HD takeover(?).
Below is a subject bandied about for years:
Is NHRA self-insured?
Any LEARNED voices out there with FACTS?
|
Most organizations with the cash-flow and types of public exposures NHRA has, would bear a large part of exposure to "everyday and predicictable" kinds of claims (That is, Workers' Comp and General Liability <slips and falls and the like>) up to a substantial amount (i.e. $250,000. to $1 Million per claim) and purchase catastrophic insurance for losses above those "self-insured" or retained losses.
These arrangements usually involve an insurance company issueing policies and handling the routine claims but - IN EFFECT- paying them out of the insured client's checkbook.
|
 |
|
| Thread Tools |
Search this Thread |
|
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|
|