www.nitromater.com

Rules Creep in Comp

This is a discussion on Rules Creep in Comp within the NHRA forum, part of the Pit Area category; My family built a econo dragster in 1972. What a wonderful concept NHRA had....well lets say adopted. Used dragster ...


Go Back   www.nitromater.com > Pit Area > NHRA

Invite Your FriendsChat RoomBlogsHelpCenter Register Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read
Notices



Reply

 

Thread Tools Search this Thread
  #1  
Old 10-25-2007, 11:00 AM
Mark Watkins's Avatar
Nitro Freak
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 86
Rules Creep in Comp

My family built a econo dragster in 1972. What a wonderful concept NHRA had....well lets say adopted. Used dragster chassis, small block chevy, single carb and a powerglide. Bada bing, we were off to the Winternationals.

Looking at a recent ND, I saw a photo of an F/ED that looked more technologically advanced than Larry Dixon's T/F.

What a shame we let a great entry class turn into a technology and money nightmare.

Mark Watkins
www.madscientist1.com
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 10-25-2007, 11:16 AM
Dave Ring's Avatar
Nitro Freak
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Upstate NY
Posts: 680
Re: Rules Creep in Comp

If you are talking about the F/ED that won the sportsnational, it's owned by a friend of mine. I can tell you that the owner has worked hard on that car for a while and that when compared to other comp cars, it really is a relatively inexpensive car. He built the motor himself. On the other hand, he's spent money where it needs to be spent and gotten some great help form some really experienced racers-hint that manifold is a Sherman Sligh manifold, a really smart guy who helps out lots of great comp racers, including such folks as Glenn Treadwell, Al Ackerman (my engine builder and race partner), Terry Smith, and the list could go on.

As for how comp has changed over the years, well I'm old enough to remember when a car like a B or C dragster wouldn't even have a battery-you push started them. Things change.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 10-25-2007, 11:19 AM
Dave Ring's Avatar
Nitro Freak
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Upstate NY
Posts: 680
Re: Rules Creep in Comp

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mark Watkins View Post
Looking at a recent ND, I saw a photo of an F/ED that looked more technologically advanced than Larry Dixon's T/F.
Untitled Document
Actually that is quite true, particularly in terms of valve train technology, and that is likely to advance even further-Comp is the class in NHRA where more and more motors are dohc 4 valve motors and that number is likely to increase substantially next year.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 10-25-2007, 02:30 PM
Buzzz Miller's Avatar
Nitro Freak
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Peoria, AZ.
Posts: 357
Re: Rules Creep in Comp

Any time you let the greatest minds of our sport come out and play, they will keep upping the anti. Comp is no longer a SBC with injectors. Even in the SBC injected cars. Just like Dale Eaton stated to me. Comp is just Pro Stock Junior.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 10-25-2007, 02:40 PM
Bill Sweeney's Avatar
Nitro Freak
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 113
Re: Rules Creep in Comp

There's a local comp eliminator team here in my neighborhood (pretty easy to figure out if you read ND ads) that is moving to Pro Stock because it will actually be easier and less expensive than running Comp!
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 10-25-2007, 02:43 PM
CJ Curtsinger's Avatar
Buddy
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Tallahassee, FL
Posts: 314
Re: Rules Creep in Comp

Quote:
Originally Posted by Bill Sweeney View Post
There's a local comp eliminator team here in my neighborhood (pretty easy to figure out if you read ND ads) that is moving to Pro Stock because it will actually be easier and less expensive than running Comp!
WHAT?! does comp really cost THAT much? I knew it was really expensive, but isn't pro stock running at millions a year to be competitive?

CJ Curtsinger
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 10-25-2007, 02:48 PM
Bill Sweeney's Avatar
Nitro Freak
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 113
Re: Rules Creep in Comp

They lease their engines and will continue to do that in P/S. Big expense is for teams with their own enigine development prgrams.

And please don't confuse the term less expensive with cheaper. It's just that there is more to gain by running P/S than an 800+ c.i. engine in Comp.

Last edited by Bill Sweeney; 10-25-2007 at 03:00 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 10-25-2007, 04:25 PM
Nitro Freak
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 202
Re: Rules Creep in Comp

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mark Watkins View Post
My family built a econo dragster in 1972. What a wonderful concept NHRA had....well lets say adopted. Used dragster chassis, small block chevy, single carb and a powerglide. Bada bing, we were off to the Winternationals.

Looking at a recent ND, I saw a photo of an F/ED that looked more technologically advanced than Larry Dixon's T/F.

What a shame we let a great entry class turn into a technology and money nightmare.

Mark Watkins
Untitled Document
More ironic is what it co$t$ to field a competitive car in STOCK!
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 10-25-2007, 05:02 PM
John Panuzzo's Avatar
Nitro Freak
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Somers NY
Posts: 641
Re: Rules Creep in Comp

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mike Parente View Post
More ironic is what it co$t$ to field a competitive car in STOCK!

Actually if you wanted to be competitive in stock yes you'd have to spend a BIG BUNDLE of $$... especially if your running a popular class... (forget SS/AH) your well into 6 figures..

However if you/me (any little guy) really wanted to run in a national event in Stock, I think the best bet would be to pick an "oddball" class ...that way if you do NOT have to race another car in your class, & its a "Bracket" race, & you have a chance.... however if the ladder puts you up against another car in the same class its "Heads Up" with no breakout..

Bottom line (in my way of thinking, & I could very well be wrong) is if I had big $$ I'd pick a nice fast class B/FIA or C/FIA .. something that runs in the 10 or 11's so it wouldn't have traction problems.. and I could work on consistency and my reaction times..

However if money was an issue I'd think about a Front wheel Drive car.. maybe a turbo Mopar.. I think its A/FW you could add weight and make it B/FW ... point being you probably wont have another car in your class, & in eliminations you could dial your own ET (as long as it was faster than the class index)

I might be full of B*** S*** but thats how I'd race in Stock if I wanted to... or if I did have unlimited funds A/SA (A nice 454 Vette) or Nova would be great

Someone correct me if I'm off base in my thinking...
__________________
"When I die, I want to die like my grandfather, who died peacefully in his sleep. Not screaming in panic like the passengers in his car."

Last edited by John Panuzzo; 10-25-2007 at 05:04 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 10-25-2007, 10:14 PM
Justin Levitte's Avatar
Nitro Freak
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Peoria, AZ
Posts: 435
Re: Rules Creep in Comp

I am having a brain fade of who the owner was, but back in the mid 90's I was talking to the comp guys from southern Cal that raced the beautiful Spies & Hecker Olds in Comp. He told me that comp was so expensive that it cost him money even if he didnt show up at the race. That would refer to someone banging the index and he would have to improve performance just to stay on par with the class.

Jim Kennedy (RIP) gave me my introduction to the class one year at the PRP (Now Speedworld) Divisional race. I loved that Orbital Firebird and wanted to learn more about the class. At the time I was announcing races on a regular basis and found the class I love so much. He had two (I believe) 280 ci motors from Bob Panella. He said (12 years ago) that the motors were in the $40k range.

My dream and goal in drag racing is to run Comp one day. Right now I have a seven second dragster, but that isn't anything compared to what is needed to run with these guys. I know it is going to take more than hoping, and a lot of money to meet my goal. One day, maybe another 20 years, but I will do it. I have taken on Mike Ashley's slogan, and Expect to Win!
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 10-25-2007, 10:37 PM
Robert Korreck's Avatar
Nitro Freak
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 306
Re: Rules Creep in Comp

Quote:
Originally Posted by John Panuzzo View Post

However if money was an issue I'd think about a Front wheel Drive car.. maybe a turbo Mopar.. I think its A/FW you could add weight and make it B/FW ... point being you probably wont have another car in your class, & in eliminations you could dial your own ET (as long as it was faster than the class index)
Running faster than the index is the problem John. You're still going to put out a lot of money to be able to do that.

Stick with Footbrake. The money is there if you will travel to collect it.

Good luck Saturday at Raceway Park boss. I'll be in Denton, Tx for 3 days and we'll see if I can carry some loot out of there.
__________________
Bob
Doug - 2006 & Greg - 2007 The Real Champs
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 10-26-2007, 12:54 AM
Nitro Freak
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Tightwad,TEXAS
Posts: 191
Re: Rules Creep in Comp

Quote:
Originally Posted by Justin Levitte View Post
I am having a brain fade of who the owner was, but back in the mid 90's I was talking to the comp guys from southern Cal that raced the beautiful Spies & Hecker Olds in Comp. He told me that comp was so expensive that it cost him money even if he didnt show up at the race. That would refer to someone banging the index and he would have to improve performance just to stay on par with the class.
That would be the Chapparone Bros. ,Tony & Mark out of the San Diego area.
They have or had a chain of auto body places in the San Diego area. Their paint jobs on the race car were always AWESOME !! Another guy from that area that always had GREAT paint jobs was Mathais Ponce, really beautiful dragster !!
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 10-26-2007, 08:25 AM
Nitro Freak
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: H-Town
Posts: 78
Re: Rules Creep in Comp

Running stock can be relatively inexpensive IF you don't want to be the fastest in your class. My brother bought a turn key J/SA Camaro, that runs .4 under the index, for around 8K. If you DO want to be the fastest, you are going to spend some serious cash. I have a friend that has bought three engines in the last year to be the fastest in his class. They weren't cheap either.

After qualifying, it's really just a glorified bracket race. The only problem with not being the fastest in your class is when you pair up with someone in the same class. If they are faster than you, you have to hope they redlight, sleep or break something.
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 10-26-2007, 10:31 AM
Keith Niemann's Avatar
Nitro Freak
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Goddard, Ks
Posts: 45
Re: Rules Creep in Comp

I never looked at Comp as an inexpensive class, quite the opposite. It's still one of my favorite classes, love watching 8 second inline sixes, and 4 cyl dragsters, small block prostock cars and the like. Lots of variety, good racing, just not cheap. My dad worked for Paterson Racing for a bit and it's amazing the stuff they do to motors, and they build good ones if you got the cash. Alot of the PS guys come from comp, both engine builders and drivers, and technology goes back and forth, it's a great deal. If you want "cost effective" national event racing pick up a Super Street car, it doens't take much to build the motor and get a stop to hit the number. We run SC on a small budget, and have a great time with it. Too many people have went crazy with the super classes building 70k dragsters and 400k tow rigs with giant trailers, but we still go rounds against them because it's not really the money that wins in the super catagories.
__________________
Nemo
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 10-26-2007, 10:49 AM
Tim Charlet's Avatar
Tim5636sc
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Nitroville, Colorado
Posts: 839
Blog Entries: 2
Re: Rules Creep in Comp

Quote:
Originally Posted by Bill Sweeney View Post
They lease their engines and will continue to do that in P/S. Big expense is for teams with their own enigine development prgrams.

And please don't confuse the term less expensive with cheaper. It's just that there is more to gain by running P/S than an 800+ c.i. engine in Comp.
Would that be Vinnie and David's team??? I guess they sold David's car because he's not at vegas. Vinnie went up there last night and went WAY RIGHT right off the starting line. I sat next to his POSSE in the stands and they're awesome Folks!

Timmah!

PS: Mad Props to the Professor as Lee Made a nice solid pass!
__________________
Timmah! 5636 S/C
"It's NOT MY FAULT YOUR SLOW!" -D. Patrick!

http://www.myspace.com/timcharlet
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



New To Site?

Need Help?




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:37 AM.


Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Nitromater Ltd.

Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.1.0 ©2007, Crawlability, Inc.

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58