Quote:
Originally Posted by Norm Porter
Randy G- you've seen my personal notes to you on some of this and we've known each other for about 25 years and I respect your intellect and philosophy on Drag Racing BUT
I have to take exception to your statement that the Funny Car Spec is "FINE"
No it is NOT and it needs a complete study as the Larue and Davis studies have done with Top Fuel.
The hardened tubing is, of course, a GROSS mistake, but the forces being applied today are no way totally understood yet in either nitro category and you TAFC guys may be closer to the danger zone than you think.
The hardened tubing fiasco should be a wakeup call to COMPLETE REFORM of the fueler specs. Done by people other than a Community College educated builder (as am I) but rather with the vast technical resources that today we have available.
Good to see the almost world's best T-Shirt printer posting-Hi. Kevin!
Off my soapbox!
NSP
|
Norm:
Always glad to see when someone of your ability chimes in, even though Top Gas did go with an index as I recommended back when OCIR was still open. LOL.
Not long after that I jumped ship and built my first TA/FC because I didn't like index racing.
Hight's current Plueger car should be captured in a picture and posted in the SFI manual as the definition of the current SFI chassis spec built literally, not "equivelant to."
We'll see how he does, but Plueger's cars are not having any issues. Neither are Grant Downing's CSK fleet of cars. Both are very similar to each other.
I stand by my statement that the current SFI spec taken literally is fine.
RG