www.nitromater.com Register Now!

CompPlus story on the FC chassis problems

This is a discussion on CompPlus story on the FC chassis problems within the NHRA forum, part of the Pit Area category; Torco Racing Fuel's Competition Plus.com - Drag Racing's Internet Magazine - TUBULAR TALES -- AN INVESTIGATIVE STORY...


Go Back   www.nitromater.com > Pit Area > NHRA

Invite Your Friends Register Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read
Notices


Reply

 

Thread Tools Search this Thread Translate
  #1  
Old 10-22-2007, 01:23 AM
John Hutchinson's Avatar
Nitro Freak
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Gateshead, England
Posts: 507
CompPlus story on the FC chassis problems

Torco Racing Fuel's Competition Plus.com - Drag Racing's Internet Magazine - TUBULAR TALES -- AN INVESTIGATIVE STORY
__________________
Fuel Altereds Forever
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 10-22-2007, 04:49 AM
Randy Goodwin's Avatar
Nitro Freak
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Fullerton, CA
Posts: 506
Re: CompPlus story on the FC chassis problems

Read the story, then read the list below.

Column one is the chassis builders who support the use of heat treated tubing.

The second column is a list of those who support the use of normalized (non heat treated) tubing.

The third column was those who failed to respond when asked.

RG

Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 10-22-2007, 08:17 AM
Robert Korreck's Avatar
Nitro Freak
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 311
Re: CompPlus story on the FC chassis problems

I sat here reading this article in utter amazement. This thing is going to be beaten to death and I know nothing about building a chassis so I have just a few comments.

Hats off to Comp+. One heck of a job. You have gotten into the depth of this problem that otherwise would have been just speculation by many. Amazing article.

This is a quote from the article that may be mis-leading to some but I understand John would probably not know this unless he were an engineer.

"Military Specification MIL-T-6736B. This document, which is dated 1965 and has since been superseded". ALL military specs that I know of have been superseded but not necessarily changed. The military is simply no longer maintaining these records.

I find this statement almost unbelievable.

"Despite the comment of a prominent NHRA official in a meeting with team owners on Friday at the Dallas race – two days before Force’s accident -- that we will have to accept fatalities as a part of drag racing, this is clearly a matter of major importance that needs further and immediate study. There’s simply no other choice."

Who in their right mind would make a statement like that? He obviously hasn't much regard for a human life.
__________________
Bob
Doug - 2006 & Greg - 2007 The Real Champs
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 10-22-2007, 08:21 AM
Robert Korreck's Avatar
Nitro Freak
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 311
Re: CompPlus story on the FC chassis problems

Randy, I don't know where you got this list from but it sure is an eye opener. Thanks.
__________________
Bob
Doug - 2006 & Greg - 2007 The Real Champs
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 10-22-2007, 09:12 AM
Brent Busch's Avatar
.
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Cedar Rapids, Iowa
Posts: 1,931
Re: CompPlus story on the FC chassis problems

Wow, that's quite an eye opening list! NHRA better do something and do something quick.

Dumb question...who is Ty Baumgartner associated with? I remember meeting him several years ago at Cordova and speaking with him for a little bit but I can't remember which shop he's with. If I remember right didn't he and somebody else buy out another shop many years ago, correct?
__________________
"I got a fever, and the only prescription... is more cowbell!"

Buell's and Hardley's suck!
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 10-22-2007, 09:24 AM
Jim Burke's Avatar
Nitro Freak
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: West of Chicago out among the corn fields
Posts: 344
Re: CompPlus story on the FC chassis problems

It never ceases to amaze me is how hard it is for people to say. "I was wrong. I made a decision based on what I thought was good information that proved to be flawed.".

I know a few of the people on the list for Normalization and if they say that is the way to go then I believe without hesitation. I would put my life in their chassis any time 24/7.

Why should it matter, "he said - they said"? All that should really matter is finding the correct answer without all the "cyoa" going on. All anybody wants is a safe car. Why is this so difficult to put aside ego's and fears and make the proper decisions to get this done?

jim
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 10-22-2007, 09:43 AM
Nitro Freak
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Albuquerque, NM
Posts: 4,951
Re: CompPlus story on the FC chassis problems

I know this doesn't have anything to do with Funny Cars, but I was talking with a crew member of Bill Miller's at some race I guessing 7-8(?) years ago? I brought up Russ Collin's Blowover(Bill Miller car) at the '91 Winter Natl's, and how spectacular the crash was. What shocked the hell out of me was the car they were running at this preticular race was the very car they replaced after Collin's Blowover! I'm guessing that car had to be 8-10 years old give or take? Who knows how many Passes that Don Long car had on it? And to be honest I can't think of any Chassis Failure of a BME car?
__________________
Shift for Brains!!!!
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 10-22-2007, 10:01 AM
Brent Busch's Avatar
.
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Cedar Rapids, Iowa
Posts: 1,931
Re: CompPlus story on the FC chassis problems

This is incredible:
Quote:
Fact: The SFI Funny Car chassis spec does not call for the use of heat treated tubing.

Fact: McKinney Corporation’s owner, Murf McKinney, has publicly stated he’s used, and continues to use, heat treated tubing in Funny Car chassis construction.

Conclusion: NHRA, despite knowing about the use of heat treated tubing, and despite their own rules that demand strict adherence to the SFI chassis spec, has allowed this to continue, with their logic apparently being that the word “equivalent” in the spec allows a builder to substitute the called-for Condition N tubing with heat treated tubing of greater dimensions.
Does this possibly mean that since NHRA refused to enforce their own rules that one driver was killed and another was seriously injured? Why would they let a chassis that obviously does not comply with the rules be entered into competition?

I also didn't know there was video of Medlen's crash until now:
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dr. Metz
I looked at videos of both of them, and I don’t think there’s any question about Medlen’s.
__________________
"I got a fever, and the only prescription... is more cowbell!"

Buell's and Hardley's suck!
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 10-22-2007, 12:30 PM
Bobby Miller's Avatar
Nitro Freak
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Peoria, Arizona
Posts: 2,371
Re: CompPlus story on the FC chassis problems

Randy, I've read your posts about this chassis crisis since John's major failure. I believe you have really stuck your neck out in an effort to bring greater safety to our sport. Your name is on the line with each post but I find your credibility to be flawless in this mission to bring the truth to light and I want to thank you for informing me and others about the truth of what is being otherwise shaded or rationalized away. I sincerely appreciate your effort to provide such information. It's QUITE enlightening!

Let's get the NHRA and SFI to agree with the masses, experience, test results and experts opinion that there needs to be some eyes opened with relation to hardened tubing.

A very small chassis builder (yet a very wise man) built our funny cars named Hal Canode. He insisted upon using the heavier wall tubing for all our main frame rails and we had no reason whatsoever to question since his cars are solid, run straight and true, last well beyond our decade of use and are as safe as any we've seen. I suppose you could add his name to the middle column as well.
__________________
"The Doctor"
www.wannaberacing.com
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 10-22-2007, 01:34 PM
Nitro Freak
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Elgin, IL
Posts: 505
Re: CompPlus story on the FC chassis problems

All I can say is "Wow". What a great article.
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 10-22-2007, 01:49 PM
Mel Smith's Avatar
Nitro Freak
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 867
Re: CompPlus story on the FC chassis problems

Quote:
Originally Posted by Jim Burke View Post
It never ceases to amaze me is how hard it is for people to say. "I was wrong. I made a decision based on what I thought was good information that proved to be flawed.".

I know a few of the people on the list for Normalization and if they say that is the way to go then I believe without hesitation. I would put my life in their chassis any time 24/7.

Why should it matter, "he said - they said"? All that should really matter is finding the correct answer without all the "cyoa" going on. All anybody wants is a safe car. Why is this so difficult to put aside ego's and fears and make the proper decisions to get this done?

jim
Probably just the result of the world we live in and the fear of litigation
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 10-22-2007, 02:02 PM
Nitro Freak
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 351
Re: CompPlus story on the FC chassis problems

Quote:
Originally Posted by Randy Goodwin View Post
Read the story, then read the list below.

Column one is the chassis builders who support the use of heat treated tubing.

The second column is a list of those who support the use of normalized (non heat treated) tubing.

The third column was those who failed to respond when asked.

RG

Kudos! Nice work, Randy!
__________________
Jay
_______________________
J. Rathman Sports, LLC.Support Bacteria...Its the only culture some people have!
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 10-22-2007, 02:18 PM
Nitro Freak
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 351
Re: CompPlus story on the FC chassis problems

Quote:
Originally Posted by Jim Burke View Post
It never ceases to amaze me is how hard it is for people to say. "I was wrong. I made a decision based on what I thought was good information that proved to be flawed.".

I know a few of the people on the list for Normalization and if they say that is the way to go then I believe without hesitation. I would put my life in their chassis any time 24/7.

Why should it matter, "he said - they said"? All that should really matter is finding the correct answer without all the "cyoa" going on. All anybody wants is a safe car. Why is this so difficult to put aside ego's and fears and make the proper decisions to get this done?

jim
To be more specific, are you referring to the powers that be at the NHRA? Here is why I ask....And this is what has been told to me, so please correct me if I am wrong here.......Murph McKinney sold the idea to the NHRA that the back half of the T/F dragsters had to be heat treated, so the NHRA listened to him, as one could find reasonable (to a point, anyway) because of his experience...For WHATEVER reason, this wasn't duplicated on the Funny Car chassis....my first question would be why not? He DOES use the heat treated tubing on the Funny Cars that HE builds...

Now, from the standpoint of major breakages, I have only heard of Murph cars experiencing this...No major problems from Pluegers, or Worsham's, even considering the nasty crashes that he has had...

But furthermore, in this poll that Randy posted, if all but one chassis manufacturer said "regular tubing" instead of heat treated tubing SEVERAL DAYS AGO, and the NHRA has still not done anything about it, then I am quite concerned why they would withold this info, and not have instituted the change imediately once the vote amongst these experts was so unanimous... for putting safety second to ANYTHING....
__________________
Jay
_______________________
J. Rathman Sports, LLC.Support Bacteria...Its the only culture some people have!
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 10-22-2007, 02:23 PM
Tim Charlet's Avatar
Tim5636sc
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Nitroville, Colorado
Posts: 1,258
Blog Entries: 2
Re: CompPlus story on the FC chassis problems

BOBBY;;;;

You were right....SCARED!

Give Asher a huge PAT ON THE BACK FOR ME! ACTUALLY, I'LL BUY HIM A DIET MOUNTAIN DEW IN VEGAS!

Timmah!
__________________
Timmah! 5636 S/C
Read the Blog's At COMPETITIONPLUS.COM!
http://www.myspace.com/timcharlet
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 10-22-2007, 03:18 PM
Ugly one
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 127
Re: CompPlus story on the FC chassis problems

Bill, Jon & Randy,
Excellent job. In a world where the masses feel that been politically correct is correct. It's refreshing to find a group of gentlemen who still have balls enough to call it what it really is.

KS
www.hotrodsbystith.com
Reply With Quote
Reply

Tags
chassis, compplus, problems, story

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:24 PM.


Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Nitromater Ltd.

Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.1.0 ©2007, Crawlability, Inc.

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76