www.nitromater.com Register Now!

Prominant FC chassis builder speaks his mind.

This is a discussion on Prominant FC chassis builder speaks his mind. within the NHRA forum, part of the Pit Area category; mabey i have overlooked this but i will ask ..ARE Forces cars built from heat treated tubing, and is it ...


Go Back   www.nitromater.com > Pit Area > NHRA

Invite Your Friends Register Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read
Notices


Reply

 

Thread Tools Search this Thread Translate
  #16  
Old 10-13-2007, 02:05 PM
Bruce Mullins's Avatar
Nitro Freak
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 364
Re: Prominant FC chassis builder speaks his mind.

mabey i have overlooked this but i will ask ..ARE Forces cars built from heat treated tubing, and is it required by nhra in the fuel funny cars or is it a specific way one builder chooses to build his chassis ? sorry if the question was already answered but i have goten lost on a couple of these threads.
Reply With Quote
  #17  
Old 10-13-2007, 02:54 PM
Nitro Freak
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Spartanburg, SC
Posts: 657
Re: Prominant FC chassis builder speaks his mind.

Jon Asher has finished our investigation of the Funny Car chassis issue and we will publish our article this week. We spoke to all the parties involved including those who declined to speak to us on the matter. Getting the story out first wasn't important to us as getting an accurate and comprehensive investigative story.

Stay tuned. This may very well be the strongest article that Jon Asher has penned in 40 years of drag racing journalism.
Reply With Quote
  #18  
Old 10-13-2007, 03:14 PM
Nitro Freak
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Albuquerque, NM
Posts: 4,951
Re: Prominant FC chassis builder speaks his mind.

Quote:
Originally Posted by bruce mullins View Post
mabey i have overlooked this but i will ask ..ARE Forces cars built from heat treated tubing, and is it required by nhra in the fuel funny cars or is it a specific way one builder chooses to build his chassis ? sorry if the question was already answered but i have goten lost on a couple of these threads.
Bruce, I have NO idea what the rules are for Heat treating on these cars. But whatever McKinney was doing on the Force cars obviously isn't working! If indeed Grant Downing's record building these Chassis is what he says it is. I think NHRA needs to look at what's working on his cars and go from there. As Far as NHRA being in Ostrich mode as Jim Young's suggesting, NHRA can't make any rule changes with just 2 races to go. But I sure hope that people like Grant Downing have some imput in Glendora before they mandate the class out of existance!
__________________
Shift for Brains!!!!
Reply With Quote
  #19  
Old 10-13-2007, 03:46 PM
Jeremy MacKenzie's Avatar
Nitro Freak
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Lacombe, Alberta, Canada
Posts: 114
Re: Prominant FC chassis builder speaks his mind.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Bobby Bennett View Post
Jon Asher has finished our investigation of the Funny Car chassis issue and we will publish our article this week. We spoke to all the parties involved including those who declined to speak to us on the matter. Getting the story out first wasn't important to us as getting an accurate and comprehensive investigative story.

Stay tuned. This may very well be the strongest article that Jon Asher has penned in 40 years of drag racing journalism.
Looking very forward to reading it. Thanks Bobby.
Reply With Quote
  #20  
Old 10-13-2007, 05:48 PM
67 Cuda
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Williamsburg, VA
Posts: 138
Re: Prominant FC chassis builder speaks his mind.

Nothing against anybodys chassis building but is it possible that JFR is producing more power and more downforce than anybody else and loading the tires and chassis more? Just seems to me that they (JFR) might have hit the area that things start to fail. Maybe not. Maybe they just have poor quality parts?? Not likely with unlimited funds. I am sure there is lots of testing going on and lots more changes coming.

It would be interesting to see if anybody is going to invest in destructive testing of chassis. Seems like with the right setup, a delaminating outof balance rear tire could be duplicated in a test facility and see what fails first.
Reply With Quote
  #21  
Old 10-13-2007, 06:41 PM
Randy Goodwin's Avatar
Nitro Freak
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Fullerton, CA
Posts: 506
Re: Prominant FC chassis builder speaks his mind.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Jed Delaune View Post
It would be interesting to see if anybody is going to invest in destructive testing of chassis. Seems like with the right setup, a delaminating outof balance rear tire could be duplicated in a test facility and see what fails first.
Destructive testing was done on two dragtser chassis at great expense with alarming results. It was posted on the Dragster chassis thread. All of the results were of no interest to the rule makers. There is the problem.
Reply With Quote
  #22  
Old 10-13-2007, 06:43 PM
Randy Goodwin's Avatar
Nitro Freak
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Fullerton, CA
Posts: 506
Re: Prominant FC chassis builder speaks his mind.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Bobby Bennett View Post
Stay tuned. This may very well be the strongest article that Jon Asher has penned in 40 years of drag racing journalism.
Reply With Quote
  #23  
Old 10-13-2007, 07:26 PM
Bruce Mullins's Avatar
Nitro Freak
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 364
Re: Prominant FC chassis builder speaks his mind.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Jed Delaune View Post
Nothing against anybodys chassis building but is it possible that JFR is producing more power and more downforce than anybody else and loading the tires and chassis more? Just seems to me that they (JFR) might have hit the area that things start to fail. Maybe not. Maybe they just have poor quality parts?? Not likely with unlimited funds. I am sure there is lots of testing going on and lots more changes coming.

It would be interesting to see if anybody is going to invest in destructive testing of chassis. Seems like with the right setup, a delaminating outof balance rear tire could be duplicated in a test facility and see what fails first.
i doubt john force's team is making THAT much more power than everyone else. i have been told that most all of the big teams make around the same power, it's just how you manage that power is how you win races.
Reply With Quote
  #24  
Old 10-13-2007, 07:49 PM
Randy Goodwin's Avatar
Nitro Freak
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Fullerton, CA
Posts: 506
Re: Prominant FC chassis builder speaks his mind.

Quote:
Originally Posted by bruce mullins View Post
i doubt john force's team is making THAT much more power than everyone else. i have been told that most all of the big teams make around the same power, it's just how you manage that power is how you win races.
Excellent post.
Reply With Quote
  #25  
Old 10-13-2007, 08:51 PM
Nitro Freak
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: CheeseLand
Posts: 252
Re: Prominant FC chassis builder speaks his mind.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Joe Sherwood View Post
Bruce, I have NO idea what the rules are for Heat treating on these cars.
Heat treating isn't required for F/C's, and for T/F, heavier tubing can be used instead of the heat treated.
Steve & Grant use .065 pipe in the lower frame rails. Murf uses .058 , the minimum SFI spec. Also the slip tube is what some guys want too!
I hear that Steve has just finished a new frame for Densham , and thats his last modern F/C .
I hope he just keeps building CLASSIC funny cars for years .
" Two mags for too much power" "Kill the down force, Save the tires "
Reply With Quote
  #26  
Old 10-13-2007, 09:43 PM
Bruce Mullins's Avatar
Nitro Freak
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 364
Re: Prominant FC chassis builder speaks his mind.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Jerry Newman View Post
Heat treating isn't required for F/C's, and for T/F, heavier tubing can be used instead of the heat treated.
Steve & Grant use .065 pipe in the lower frame rails. Murf uses .058 , the minimum SFI spec. Also the slip tube is what some guys want too!
I hear that Steve has just finished a new frame for Densham , and thats his last modern F/C .
I hope he just keeps building CLASSIC funny cars for years .
" Two mags for too much power" "Kill the down force, Save the tires "
i am pretty heat treated tubing IS required in top fuel dragsters for the back halfs . i remember vandergrif's car couldn't test at vegas last year because the back half was not heat treated.
Reply With Quote
  #27  
Old 10-13-2007, 10:21 PM
Jim Young's Avatar
Nitro Freak
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Tempe, AZ
Posts: 1,225
Re: Prominant FC chassis builder speaks his mind.

Quote:
Originally Posted by David McCandless View Post
So is NHRA supposed to come up with a 'common' chassis for everyone to use? Or are they supposed to redo everyone's chassis b/c JFR has had problems? Is it NHRA's responsibility to 'correct' the chassis problems for teams that are not having problems???
David - A McKinney chassis failed, seriously injuring a driver. Teams other than JFR run McKinney chassis. I think it would be reasonable for NHRA to determine what went wrong and inform those teams. NHRA is SUPPOSED to be in charge of safety. As far as any of us know, there has been no report on chassis issues from NHRA or any plans for testing or new chassis rules.
Is NHRA supposed to come up with a common chassis? If that is what it takes, yes.

And . . . does anyone know how to actually access the current FC and TF chassis rules? There certainly is a lot of confusion here!
__________________
"The Counterfeiter"
Reply With Quote
  #28  
Old 10-13-2007, 10:48 PM
Bruce Mullins's Avatar
Nitro Freak
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 364
Re: Prominant FC chassis builder speaks his mind.

the (SFI) chassis spect are not posted anywhere i know of in the open. you have to buy a copy from sfi.
Reply With Quote
  #29  
Old 10-14-2007, 12:22 AM
Nitro Freak
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 14
Re: Prominant FC chassis builder speaks his mind.

go here: SFI Web Site
$35.00 and you can own the spec.
God I love this sport, nothing that money can,t take care of, or fix.
Reply With Quote
  #30  
Old 10-14-2007, 02:18 AM
Matt McKibbon's Avatar
Stroker
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Wyoming
Posts: 370
Re: Prominant FC chassis builder speaks his mind.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Jim Young View Post
David - A McKinney chassis failed, seriously injuring a driver. Teams other than JFR run McKinney chassis. I think it would be reasonable for NHRA to determine what went wrong and inform those teams. NHRA is SUPPOSED to be in charge of safety. As far as any of us know, there has been no report on chassis issues from NHRA or any plans for testing or new chassis rules.
Is NHRA supposed to come up with a common chassis? If that is what it takes, yes.

And . . . does anyone know how to actually access the current FC and TF chassis rules? There certainly is a lot of confusion here!
With this being said, could it be something done to the chassis after it leaves the builders shop!
__________________
******** AHDRA -- PG 144 ********
www.americancycleperformance.com
_____PROUD Member of ACWC _____
Reply With Quote
Reply

Tags
builder, chassis, mind, prominant, speaks

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:18 PM.


Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Nitromater Ltd.

Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.1.0 ©2007, Crawlability, Inc.

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76